netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: add BPF_LWT_ENCAP_IP option to bpf_lwt_push

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPNVh5cFZJAuBo7XV61csF1x1sQaP_Xh7YKAV4toPygxYFggoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:14:24 -0800
From:   Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        posk.devel@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: add BPF_LWT_ENCAP_IP option to bpf_lwt_push_encap

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 3:52 PM David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/30/18 4:35 PM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> > Thanks, David! This is for egress only, so I'll add an appropriate
> > check. I'll also address your other comments/concerns in a v2 version
> > of this patchset.
>
> Why are you limiting this to egress only?

I'm focusing on egress because this is a use case that we have and
understand well, and would like to have a solution for sooner rather
than later.

Without understanding why anybody would want to do lwt-bpf encap on
ingress, I don't know, for example, what a good test would look like;
but I'd be happy to look into a specific ingress use case if you have
one.