lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpUyidPWBVSRZL74Lf3cqC6FCZNV2JFM=TTk6V7SPFSN5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Dec 2018 10:15:01 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] mlx5: check for malformed packets

On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 9:11 PM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 12:56 AM Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +     } else if (*proto == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) {
> >
> > No need for an else here, the first if block always returns.
>
>
> Yeah, but not sure if this makes a difference on the generated
> asm code. I will give it a try anyway.

I just tried, there is no difference on the generated assembly code.

The gcc I use is:

$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 8.2.1 20181011 (Red Hat 8.2.1-4)
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


Are you okay with the current code now? :)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ