[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181203190122.GQ25748@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 20:01:22 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Steve Douthit <stephend@...icom-usa.com>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] ixgbe: use mii_bus to handle MII related
ioctls
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 06:55:26PM +0000, Steve Douthit wrote:
> Use the mii_bus callbacks to address the entire clause 22/45 address
> space. Enables userspace to poke switch registers instead of a single
> PHY address.
>
> The ixgbe firmware may be polling PHYs in a way that is not protected by
> the mii_bus lock. This isn't new behavior, but as Andrew Lunn pointed
> out there are more addresses available for conflicts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Douthit <stephend@...icom-usa.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists