netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/4] etf: Cancel timer if there are no pending skbs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 03 Dec 2018 11:19:45 -0800
From:   Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jesus Sanchez-Palencia <jesus.sanchez-palencia@...el.com>,
        jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
        jesus.s.palencia@...il.com, ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/4] etf: Cancel timer if there are no pending skbs

Hi,

Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com> writes:

> From: Jesus Sanchez-Palencia <jesus.sanchez-palencia@...el.com>
>
> There is no point in firing the qdisc watchdog if there are no future
> skbs pending in the queue and the watchdog had been set previously.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesus Sanchez-Palencia <jesus.s.palencia@...il.com>

It seems that I made a mistake when submitting this series.

It should have been proposed to the net tree (instead of net-next) and
should have included a "Fixes" tag.

Is there a way to have this series considered for the net tree at this
point (given that it already landed on net-next)?

Cheers,
--
Vinicius