[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181204162208.tn4ljbiqtby6pc52@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 08:22:10 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Fix unsafe BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN interface
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 11:31:22AM +0000, Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> Right now, there is no safe way to use BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with data_out.
> This is because bpf_test_finish copies the output buffer to user space
> without checking its size. This can lead to the kernel overwriting
> data in user space after the buffer if xdp_adjust_head and friends are
> in play.
>
> Thanks to everyone for their advice and patience with this patch set!
>
> Changes in v5:
> * Fix up libbpf.map
>
> Changes in v4:
> * Document bpf_prog_test_run and bpf_prog_test_run_xattr
> * Use struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr for return values
>
> Changes in v3:
> * Introduce bpf_prog_test_run_xattr instead of modifying the existing
> function
>
> Changes in v2:
> * Make the syscall return ENOSPC if data_size_out is too small
> * Make bpf_prog_test_run return EINVAL if size_out is missing
> * Document the new behaviour of data_size_out
Applied, Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists