[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4bcf49b33a8e4ae29ef44351bf5c0bf2@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:59:17 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Tariq Toukan' <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net 1/2] net/mlx4_en: Change min MTU size to ETH_MIN_MTU
From: Tariq Toukan
> Sent: 02 December 2018 12:35
> From: Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>
>
> NIC driver minimal MTU size shall be set to ETH_MIN_MTU, as defined in
> the RFC791 and in the network stack. Remove old mlx4_en only define for
> it, which was set to wrong value.
...
>
> - /* MTU range: 46 - hw-specific max */
> - dev->min_mtu = MLX4_EN_MIN_MTU;
> + /* MTU range: 68 - hw-specific max */
> + dev->min_mtu = ETH_MIN_MTU;
> dev->max_mtu = priv->max_mtu;
Where does 68 come from?
The minimum size of an ethernet packet including the mac addresses
and CRC is 64 bytes - but that would never be an 'mtu'.
Since 64 - 46 = 18, the 46 probably excludes both MAC addresses,
the ethertype/length and the CRC.
This is 'sort of' the minimum mtu for an ethernet frame.
I'm not sure which values are supposed to be in dev->min/max_mtu.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists