netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] vmalloc: New flag for flush before releasing pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4883FED1-D0EC-41B0-A90F-1A697756D41D@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:43:11 -0800
From:   Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
To:     Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, ast@...nel.org,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, jeyu@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, kristen@...ux.intel.com,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, deneen.t.dock@...el.com,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vmalloc: New flag for flush before releasing pages

> On Nov 27, 2018, at 4:07 PM, Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> Since vfree will lazily flush the TLB, but not lazily free the underlying pages,
> it often leaves stale TLB entries to freed pages that could get re-used. This is
> undesirable for cases where the memory being freed has special permissions such
> as executable.

So I am trying to finish my patch-set for preventing transient W+X mappings
from taking space, by handling kprobes & ftrace that I missed (thanks again for
pointing it out).

But all of the sudden, I don’t understand why we have the problem that this
(your) patch-set deals with at all. We already change the mappings to make
the memory writable before freeing the memory, so why can’t we make it
non-executable at the same time? Actually, why do we make the module memory,
including its data executable before freeing it???

In other words: disable_ro_nx() is called by free_module() before freeing
the memory. Wouldn’t inverting the logic makes much more sense? I am
confused.

-- >8 --

From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Subject: [PATCH] modules: disable_ro_nx() should enable nx 

---
 kernel/module.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 7cb207249437..e12d760ea3b0 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -2029,14 +2029,13 @@ void set_all_modules_text_ro(void)
 
 static void disable_ro_nx(const struct module_layout *layout)
 {
+	frob_text(layout, set_memory_nx);
+
 	if (rodata_enabled) {
 		frob_text(layout, set_memory_rw);
 		frob_rodata(layout, set_memory_rw);
 		frob_ro_after_init(layout, set_memory_rw);
 	}
-	frob_rodata(layout, set_memory_x);
-	frob_ro_after_init(layout, set_memory_x);
-	frob_writable_data(layout, set_memory_x);
 }
 
 #else
-- 
2.17.1