[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181204040100.243614-5-sdf@google.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 20:00:59 -0800
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
simon.horman@...ronome.com, liu.song.a23@...il.com,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] net/flow_dissector: correctly cap nhoff and
thoff in case of BPF
We want to make sure that the following condition holds:
0 <= nhoff <= thoff <= skb->len
BPF program can set out-of-bounds nhoff and thoff, which is dangerous, see
recent commit d0c081b49137 ("flow_dissector: properly cap thoff field")'.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
---
net/core/flow_dissector.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
index ac19da6f390b..bb1a54747d64 100644
--- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c
+++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
@@ -716,6 +716,10 @@ bool __skb_flow_bpf_dissect(struct bpf_prog *prog,
/* Restore state */
memcpy(cb, &cb_saved, sizeof(cb_saved));
+ flow_keys->nhoff = clamp_t(u16, flow_keys->nhoff, 0, skb->len);
+ flow_keys->thoff = clamp_t(u16, flow_keys->thoff,
+ flow_keys->nhoff, skb->len);
+
return result == BPF_OK;
}
@@ -808,8 +812,6 @@ bool __skb_flow_dissect(const struct sk_buff *skb,
&flow_keys);
__skb_flow_bpf_to_target(&flow_keys, flow_dissector,
target_container);
- key_control->thoff = min_t(u16, key_control->thoff,
- skb->len);
rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
--
2.20.0.rc1.387.gf8505762e3-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists