[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1543917395-6130-7-git-send-email-jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 04:56:34 -0500
From: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
To: daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Subject: [RFC bpf-next 6/7] bpf: verifier remove the rejection on BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH
This patch remove the rejection on BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH as we have supported
them on interpreter and all JIT back-ends
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index ce8a1c3..8ed868e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -3649,11 +3649,6 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (opcode == BPF_ARSH && BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_ALU64) {
- verbose(env, "BPF_ARSH not supported for 32 bit ALU\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
if ((opcode == BPF_LSH || opcode == BPF_RSH ||
opcode == BPF_ARSH) && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
int size = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 ? 64 : 32;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists