netdev - Re: [net-next 4/7] net/mlx5e: Refactor TIR configuration function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVfe5NKS_ecds-inS0a_+G=wHxfz8e9_sH9Beu6Nb0eig@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:56:37 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        ayal@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 4/7] net/mlx5e: Refactor TIR configuration function

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10:26 PM Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com> wrote:
> +static const struct mlx5e_tirc_config
> +tirc_default_config[MLX5E_NUM_INDIR_TIRS] = {

Is it okay to define an array in a header??? No link error???

I must be dumb...