[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181205222431.120521-1-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 14:24:31 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] tcp: Do not underestimate rwnd_limited
If available rwnd is too small, tcp_tso_should_defer()
can decide it is worth waiting before splitting a TSO packet.
This really means we are rwnd limited.
Fixes: 5615f88614a4 ("tcp: instrument how long TCP is limited by receive window")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index 68b5326f73212ffe7111dd0f91e0a1246fb0ae25..3186902347584090256467d8679320666aa0257e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -2356,8 +2356,11 @@ static bool tcp_write_xmit(struct sock *sk, unsigned int mss_now, int nonagle,
} else {
if (!push_one &&
tcp_tso_should_defer(sk, skb, &is_cwnd_limited,
- max_segs))
+ max_segs)) {
+ if (!is_cwnd_limited)
+ is_rwnd_limited = true;
break;
+ }
}
limit = mss_now;
--
2.20.0.rc2.403.gdbc3b29805-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists