lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWoV660koQBZn86ccTG6nC-aDZ+t1VFPgwCXuxgfguJuw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Dec 2018 21:24:11 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        eranbe@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net/mlx4_en: Change min MTU size to ETH_MIN_MTU

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 9:06 AM Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/04/2018 08:59 AM, David Laight wrote:
> > Where does 68 come from?
>
> Min IPv4 MTU per RFC791
>

What's wrong with using IPV4_MIN_MTU instead of 68
even in just comment?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ