[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWoV660koQBZn86ccTG6nC-aDZ+t1VFPgwCXuxgfguJuw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 21:24:11 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
eranbe@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net/mlx4_en: Change min MTU size to ETH_MIN_MTU
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 9:06 AM Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/04/2018 08:59 AM, David Laight wrote:
> > Where does 68 come from?
>
> Min IPv4 MTU per RFC791
>
What's wrong with using IPV4_MIN_MTU instead of 68
even in just comment?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists