| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 17:35:47 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <kernel-team@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] bpf: Expect !info.func_info and insn_off name changes in test_btf/libbpf/bpftool
Similar to info.jited_*, info.func_info could be 0 if
bpf_dump_raw_ok() == false.
This patch makes changes to test_btf and bpftool to expect info.func_info
could be 0.
This patch also makes the needed changes for s/insn_offset/insn_off/.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
---
tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c | 7 +++++++
tools/bpf/bpftool/xlated_dumper.c | 4 ++--
tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 12 ++++++------
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c | 8 +++++++-
4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
index 56db61c5a91f..3148bc0e225b 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c
@@ -589,6 +589,13 @@ static int do_dump(int argc, char **argv)
goto err_free;
}
+ if (func_info && !info.func_info) {
+ /* kernel.kptr_restrict is set. No func_info available. */
+ free(func_info);
+ func_info = NULL;
+ finfo_cnt = 0;
+ }
+
if ((member_len == &info.jited_prog_len &&
info.jited_prog_insns == 0) ||
(member_len == &info.xlated_prog_len &&
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/xlated_dumper.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/xlated_dumper.c
index e06ac0286a75..131ecd175533 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/xlated_dumper.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/xlated_dumper.c
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ void dump_xlated_json(struct dump_data *dd, void *buf, unsigned int len,
jsonw_start_object(json_wtr);
if (btf && record) {
- if (record->insn_offset == i) {
+ if (record->insn_off == i) {
btf_dumper_type_only(btf, record->type_id,
func_sig,
sizeof(func_sig));
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ void dump_xlated_plain(struct dump_data *dd, void *buf, unsigned int len,
}
if (btf && record) {
- if (record->insn_offset == i) {
+ if (record->insn_off == i) {
btf_dumper_type_only(btf, record->type_id,
func_sig,
sizeof(func_sig));
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
index c2d641f3e16e..85d6446cf832 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ struct btf_ext {
/* The minimum bpf_func_info checked by the loader */
struct bpf_func_info_min {
- __u32 insn_offset;
+ __u32 insn_off;
__u32 type_id;
};
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ int btf_ext__reloc_init(struct btf *btf, struct btf_ext *btf_ext,
memcpy(data, sinfo->data, records_len);
- /* adjust the insn_offset, the data in .BTF.ext is
+ /* adjust the insn_off, the data in .BTF.ext is
* the actual byte offset, and the kernel expects
* the offset in term of bpf_insn.
*
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ int btf_ext__reloc_init(struct btf *btf, struct btf_ext *btf_ext,
struct bpf_func_info_min *record;
record = data + i * record_size;
- record->insn_offset /= sizeof(struct bpf_insn);
+ record->insn_off /= sizeof(struct bpf_insn);
}
*func_info = data;
@@ -722,15 +722,15 @@ int btf_ext__reloc(struct btf *btf, struct btf_ext *btf_ext,
return -ENOMEM;
memcpy(data + existing_flen, sinfo->data, records_len);
- /* adjust insn_offset only, the rest data will be passed
+ /* adjust insn_off only, the rest data will be passed
* to the kernel.
*/
for (i = 0; i < sinfo->num_func_info; i++) {
struct bpf_func_info_min *record;
record = data + existing_flen + i * record_size;
- record->insn_offset =
- record->insn_offset / sizeof(struct bpf_insn) +
+ record->insn_off =
+ record->insn_off / sizeof(struct bpf_insn) +
insns_cnt;
}
*func_info = data;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c
index bae7308b7ec5..ff0952ea757a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c
@@ -3156,7 +3156,7 @@ static struct btf_func_type_test {
},
{
- .descr = "func_type (Incorrect bpf_func_info.insn_offset)",
+ .descr = "func_type (Incorrect bpf_func_info.insn_off)",
.raw_types = {
BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(NAME_TBD, BTF_INT_SIGNED, 0, 32, 4), /* [1] */
BTF_TYPE_INT_ENC(NAME_TBD, 0, 0, 32, 4), /* [2] */
@@ -3303,6 +3303,12 @@ static int do_test_func_type(int test_num)
goto done;
}
+ if (CHECK(!info.func_info,
+ "info.func_info == 0. kernel.kptr_restrict is set?")) {
+ err = -1;
+ goto done;
+ }
+
finfo = func_info;
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
if (CHECK(finfo->type_id != test->func_info[i][1],
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists