[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181206123843.f637bvkvzibev2p5@localhost>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 04:38:43 -0800
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ptp: fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check
Greg,
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 06:10:49PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 06:55:38AM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:00:33AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > >
> > > Why did you commit 3b1ad360acad ("pps: using ERR_PTR instead of NULL
> > > while pps_register_source fails")? You're not listed as a maintainer so
> > > I wouldn't have known to CC you.
> >
> > I'm confused. Where is that commit?
...
> I'm on linux-next but originally it came from the char-misc-next tree.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git char-misc-next
Commit 3b1ad360acad changes a return value in the PPS core, but it is
missing the hunk for the caller in drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c. Can that
be amended?
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists