| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20181207192731.GB9507@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 19:27:31 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Subject: Re: OMAP4430 SDP with KS8851: very slow networking
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:03:12AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> [181207 18:14]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk> [181207 18:01]:
> > > Hi Tony,
> > >
> > > You know most of what's been going on from IRC, but here's the patch
> > > which gets me:
> > >
> > > 1) working interrupts for networking
> > > 2) solves the stuck-wakeup problem
> > >
> > > It also contains some of the debug bits I added.
> >
> > This is excellent news :) Will test today.
>
> Yes your patch seems to work great based on brief testing :)
>
> > > I think what this means is that we should strip out ec0daae685b2
> > > ("gpio: omap: Add level wakeup handling for omap4 based SoCs").
> >
> > Yes the only reason for the wakeup quirk was the stuck wakeup
> > state seen on omap4, it can be just dropped if this works.
> > Adding Grygorii to Cc too.
>
> I'll post a partial revert for commit ec0daae685b2 ("gpio: omap:
> Add level wakeup handling for omap4 based SoCs") shortly.
Hi,
You mentioned that edge mode didn't work as well as level mode on
duovero smsc controller, I think this may help to solve the same
issue but for edge IRQs - we need a mask_ack_irq function to avoid
acking while the edge interrupt is masked. Let me know if that
lowers the smsc ping latency while in edge mode.
Thanks.
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
index 3d021f648c5d..b1ad6098e894 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*/
-
+#define DEBUG
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
@@ -366,10 +366,14 @@ static inline void omap_set_gpio_trigger(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio,
trigger & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
omap_gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->leveldetect1, gpio_bit,
trigger & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH);
+ /*
+ * We need the edge detect enabled for the idle mode detection
+ * to function on OMAP4430.
+ */
omap_gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->risingdetect, gpio_bit,
- trigger & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING);
+ trigger & (IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH));
omap_gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->fallingdetect, gpio_bit,
- trigger & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING);
+ trigger & (IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW));
bank->context.leveldetect0 =
readl_relaxed(bank->base + bank->regs->leveldetect0);
@@ -899,6 +903,19 @@ static void omap_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
}
+static void omap_gpio_mask_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+ struct gpio_bank *bank = omap_irq_data_get_bank(d);
+ unsigned offset = d->hwirq;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
+ omap_clear_gpio_irqstatus(bank, offset);
+ omap_set_gpio_irqenable(bank, offset, 0);
+ omap_set_gpio_triggering(bank, offset, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
+}
+
static void omap_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct gpio_bank *bank = omap_irq_data_get_bank(d);
@@ -910,14 +927,16 @@ static void omap_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
if (trigger)
omap_set_gpio_triggering(bank, offset, trigger);
+ omap_set_gpio_irqenable(bank, offset, 1);
+
/* For level-triggered GPIOs, the clearing must be done after
- * the HW source is cleared, thus after the handler has run */
- if (bank->level_mask & BIT(offset)) {
- omap_set_gpio_irqenable(bank, offset, 0);
+ * the HW source is cleared, thus after the handler has run.
+ * OMAP4 needs this done _after_ enabing the interrupt to clear
+ * the wakeup status.
+ */
+ if (bank->level_mask & BIT(offset))
omap_clear_gpio_irqstatus(bank, offset);
- }
- omap_set_gpio_irqenable(bank, offset, 1);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
}
@@ -1377,6 +1396,7 @@ static int omap_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
irqc->irq_startup = omap_gpio_irq_startup,
irqc->irq_shutdown = omap_gpio_irq_shutdown,
+ irqc->irq_mask_ack = omap_gpio_mask_ack_irq,
irqc->irq_ack = omap_gpio_ack_irq,
irqc->irq_mask = omap_gpio_mask_irq,
irqc->irq_unmask = omap_gpio_unmask_irq,
@@ -1520,6 +1540,10 @@ static void omap_gpio_idle(struct gpio_bank *bank, bool may_lose_context)
struct device *dev = bank->chip.parent;
u32 l1 = 0, l2 = 0;
+ dev_dbg(dev, "%s(): ld 0x%08x 0x%08x we 0x%08x\n", __func__,
+ bank->context.leveldetect0, bank->context.leveldetect1,
+ bank->context.wake_en);
+
if (bank->funcs.idle_enable_level_quirk)
bank->funcs.idle_enable_level_quirk(bank);
@@ -1553,6 +1577,10 @@ static void omap_gpio_idle(struct gpio_bank *bank, bool may_lose_context)
bank->get_context_loss_count(dev);
omap_gpio_dbck_disable(bank);
+
+ dev_dbg(dev, "%s(): ld 0x%08x 0x%08x we 0x%08x\n", __func__,
+ bank->context.leveldetect0, bank->context.leveldetect1,
+ bank->context.wake_en);
}
static void omap_gpio_init_context(struct gpio_bank *p);
@@ -1563,6 +1591,10 @@ static void omap_gpio_unidle(struct gpio_bank *bank)
u32 l = 0, gen, gen0, gen1;
int c;
+ dev_dbg(dev, "%s(): ld 0x%08x 0x%08x we 0x%08x\n", __func__,
+ bank->context.leveldetect0, bank->context.leveldetect1,
+ bank->context.wake_en);
+
/*
* On the first resume during the probe, the context has not
* been initialised and so initialise it now. Also initialise
@@ -1648,6 +1680,10 @@ static void omap_gpio_unidle(struct gpio_bank *bank)
}
bank->workaround_enabled = false;
+
+ dev_dbg(dev, "%s(): ld 0x%08x 0x%08x we 0x%08x\n", __func__,
+ bank->context.leveldetect0, bank->context.leveldetect1,
+ bank->context.wake_en);
}
static void omap_gpio_init_context(struct gpio_bank *p)
@@ -1720,6 +1756,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused omap_gpio_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
error = -EBUSY;
goto unlock;
}
+ dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
omap_gpio_idle(bank, true);
bank->is_suspended = true;
unlock:
@@ -1741,6 +1778,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused omap_gpio_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
error = -EBUSY;
goto unlock;
}
+ dev_dbg(dev, "%s()\n", __func__);
omap_gpio_unidle(bank);
bank->is_suspended = false;
unlock:
@@ -1827,8 +1865,8 @@ static const struct omap_gpio_platform_data omap4_pdata = {
.regs = &omap4_gpio_regs,
.bank_width = 32,
.dbck_flag = true,
- .quirks = OMAP_GPIO_QUIRK_IDLE_REMOVE_TRIGGER |
- OMAP_GPIO_QUIRK_DEFERRED_WKUP_EN,
+ .quirks = OMAP_GPIO_QUIRK_IDLE_REMOVE_TRIGGER /* |
+ OMAP_GPIO_QUIRK_DEFERRED_WKUP_EN */,
};
static const struct of_device_id omap_gpio_match[] = {
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists