[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181207075017.10787-1-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 09:50:17 +0200
From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik@...anetworks.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, dlebrun@...gle.com
Cc: dav.lebrun@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] ipv6: sr: properly initialize flowi6 prior passing to ip6_route_output
In 'seg6_output', stack variable 'struct flowi6 fl6' was missing
initialization.
Fixes: 6c8702c60b88 ("ipv6: sr: add support for SRH encapsulation and injection with lwtunnels")
Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
---
Suggeting this fix, spotted during code review while experimenting
with SRv6, although havn't encountered a specific issue during
experiments.
Was there any genuine intention to actually keep 'fl6' uninitialized?
---
net/ipv6/seg6_iptunnel.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/seg6_iptunnel.c b/net/ipv6/seg6_iptunnel.c
index a8854dd3e9c5..8181ee7e1e27 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/seg6_iptunnel.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/seg6_iptunnel.c
@@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ static int seg6_output(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
struct ipv6hdr *hdr = ipv6_hdr(skb);
struct flowi6 fl6;
+ memset(&fl6, 0, sizeof(fl6));
fl6.daddr = hdr->daddr;
fl6.saddr = hdr->saddr;
fl6.flowlabel = ip6_flowinfo(hdr);
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists