netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: update mvneta binding document

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0dc0916f-2654-53fe-226d-f75c9498bb39@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Dec 2018 17:30:52 +0530
From:   Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: update mvneta binding document

Hi,

On 07/12/18 5:03 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 04:43:27PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Russell,
>>
>> No, I haven't merged patches from this series. That would have failed
>> compilation since Grygorii modified enum phy_mode which is used in this series.
>> You have also noted this in your cover letter.
> 
> Ok, but in any case, given the complexities of modifying the patch
> and properly testing it, I think I'll wait until those changes have
> hit mainline before re-spinning this series.  Alternatively, if
> you're happy to take just build-tested version, I could re-spin
> with that so at least we can get the phy bits queued for the merge
> window.

I'd prefer we test it before merging.
> 
> In any case, I'm busy trying to get to the bottom of several OMAP4
> bugs while ill, so this isn't something I want to do at the moment.

Take care!

Thanks
Kishon
>