[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50266e0e-e2c6-efee-89d2-7518ee2761d0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 04:34:15 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org,
BjörnTöpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>, w@....eu,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
mykyta.iziumtsev@...il.com,
Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next, RFC, 4/8] net: core: add recycle capabilities on skbs
via page_pool API
On 12/08/2018 04:29 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> But I do not get why the patch is needed.
>
> Adding extra cost for each skb destruction is costly.
>
> I though XDP was all about _not_ having skbs.
>
> Please let's do not slow down the non XDP stack only to make XDP more appealing.
>
I have a similar concern with napi_consume_skb() :
This added a cost for locally generated TCP traffic, since most TX packets are fast clones.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists