[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181209214907.GC21186@lunn.ch>
Date:   Sun, 9 Dec 2018 22:49:07 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next
 tree
On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 10:33:10PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 09.12.2018 22:11, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 08:00:45AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Commits
> >>
> >>   dc9d38cec71c ("net: phy: mdio-gpio: Add phy_ignore_ta_mask to platform data")
> >>   04fa26bab06d ("net: phy: mdio-gpio: Add platform_data support for phy_mask")
> >>
> >> are missing a Signed-off-by from their author.
> > 
> > Hi David.
> > 
> > Any idea what happened here? The version in my git repo has SOB.
> > 
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1009811/ also has my SOB.
> > 
> Instead of
> v2
> --
> int -> u32 in platform data structure
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> 
> shouldn't it be
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> ---
> v2
> - int -> u32 in platform data structure
Hi Heiner
David said he wanted to see the version history. So i deliberately put
it above the ---.
I'm just wondering if -- was enough to trigger something in David's
scripts? Or patchwork. The -- has disappeared in the commit which made
it into net-next.
   Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
