[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181209214907.GC21186@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 22:49:07 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next
tree
On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 10:33:10PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 09.12.2018 22:11, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 08:00:45AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Commits
> >>
> >> dc9d38cec71c ("net: phy: mdio-gpio: Add phy_ignore_ta_mask to platform data")
> >> 04fa26bab06d ("net: phy: mdio-gpio: Add platform_data support for phy_mask")
> >>
> >> are missing a Signed-off-by from their author.
> >
> > Hi David.
> >
> > Any idea what happened here? The version in my git repo has SOB.
> >
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1009811/ also has my SOB.
> >
> Instead of
> v2
> --
> int -> u32 in platform data structure
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>
> shouldn't it be
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> ---
> v2
> - int -> u32 in platform data structure
Hi Heiner
David said he wanted to see the version history. So i deliberately put
it above the ---.
I'm just wondering if -- was enough to trigger something in David's
scripts? Or patchwork. The -- has disappeared in the commit which made
it into net-next.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists