[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7ba722c-023c-35dc-ab97-c778c7781413@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 01:28:09 +0200
From: Risto Pajula <or.pajula@...il.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
hkallweit1@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: IP (rtl8169) forwarding bug (performance)
Hello.
Old subject: "Re: IP fragmentation performance and don't fragment bug
when forwarding
I have now been tracing the kernel and finding the bug seems difficult.
I think the bug is combination of several things, likely cause is that
it only occurs with rtl8169 and how it is using the netdevapi/DQL api.
From my investigations seems that following happens:
*Burst of frames is received from internet. (eth0)
*These are accepted and forwarded to the (eth1)
*DQL hits the limit, this causes the scheduling for the device to be
stopped (__QUEUE_STATE_STACK_XOFF)
*This and combination of some timing causes the performance
degradation, messages are only scheduled for transmission in soft Irq
context.
I still do now know, why the DQL hits the limits.. I think it should
not, maybe something undesirable first happens with rtl8169.
I inserted following trace printk functions to the code..
rtl8169_start_xmit:
trace_printk("ORP33 %s rtl8169_start_xmit len: %d entry: %u cur_tx: %u
frags: %d dirty_tx: %u tx_left: %u\n" , tp->dev->name, skb->len, entry,
tp->cur_tx, frags, tp->dirty_tx, (tp->cur_tx - tp->dirty_tx) );
rtl_tx:
trace_printk("ORP33 %s rtl_tx len: %d entry: %u cur_tx: %u frags: %d
dirty_tx: %u tx_left: %u\n" , tp->dev->name, tx_skb->skb->len,
tp->cur_tx % NUM_TX_DESC, tp->cur_tx, 0, dirty_tx, tx_left );
Here is some grepped output only filtering the ping packet in two
different situations:
//trace when downloading ubuntu (~20MB/s), only 3 secs fit to buffer.
ping is all the time normal....
//orig tracing.out3754
117493: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 5235.407116: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 57 cur_tx: 3747641 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
3747640 tx_left: 1
118704: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 5235.416057: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 20 cur_tx: 3747668 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
3747667 tx_left: 1
346319: hping3-2871 [000] .... 5236.002456:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 8
cur_tx: 3754312 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 3754312 tx_left: 0
346337: hping3-2871 [000] ..s. 5236.002475: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 9 cur_tx: 3754313 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
3754312 tx_left: 1
1277155: hping3-2871 [001] .... 5237.002627:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 38
cur_tx: 3766502 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 3766502 tx_left: 0
1277173: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 5237.002646: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 39 cur_tx: 3766503 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
3766502 tx_left: 1
//imcp messages from route to intenal network when TCP stream is on.
tracing.out3236/eth1_ring.txt is the original
//no idea why the first frame is tripled...
200792: hping3-2871 [001] .... 3239.593384:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 34
cur_tx: 2132770 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2132770 tx_left: 0
201578: hping3-2871 [001] .... 3240.593625:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 40
cur_tx: 2132776 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2132776 tx_left: 0
341061: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3241.738011:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 52
cur_tx: 2133684 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2133680 tx_left: 4
342112: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3241.745297: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 59 cur_tx: 2133691 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
2133684 tx_left: 7
500126: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3242.739500:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 49
cur_tx: 2134513 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2134505 tx_left: 8
501739: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3242.751654: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 58 cur_tx: 2134522 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
2134513 tx_left: 9
646220: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3243.745761:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 41
cur_tx: 2135273 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2135267 tx_left: 6
647633: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3243.755486: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 49 cur_tx: 2135281 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
2135273 tx_left: 8
802878: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3244.739947:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 23
cur_tx: 2136087 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2136081 tx_left: 6
804298: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3244.749677: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 31 cur_tx: 2136095 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
2136087 tx_left: 8
961190: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3245.746217:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 16
cur_tx: 2136912 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2136906 tx_left: 6
962610: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3245.755946: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 24 cur_tx: 2136920 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
2136912 tx_left: 8
1118044: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3246.740336:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 62
cur_tx: 2137726 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2137720 tx_left: 6
1119443: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3246.750047: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 5 cur_tx: 2137733 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
2137726 tx_left: 7
1264047: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3247.709202:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 29
cur_tx: 2138525 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2138518 tx_left: 7
1264740: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3247.718918: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 33 cur_tx: 2138529 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
2138525 tx_left: 4
1419958: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3248.736436:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 48
cur_tx: 2139312 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2139305 tx_left: 7
1421551: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3248.746189: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 56 cur_tx: 2139320 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
2139312 tx_left: 8
1578746: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3249.742702:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 46
cur_tx: 2140142 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2140135 tx_left: 7
1580194: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3249.752457: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 54 cur_tx: 2140150 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
2140142 tx_left: 8
1729597: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3250.746839:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 36
cur_tx: 2140964 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2140957 tx_left: 7
1731015: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3250.756594: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 43 cur_tx: 2140971 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
2140964 tx_left: 7
1881028: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3251.740991:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 19
cur_tx: 2141779 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2141772 tx_left: 7
1881381: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3251.750718: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 26 cur_tx: 2141786 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
2141779 tx_left: 7
//something happens, the output queue empties.. now it is fast, and
rtl8169_start_xmit is not called from soft_irq
1896178: hping3-2871 [001] .... 3252.595994:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 23
cur_tx: 2141911 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2141911 tx_left: 0
1896196: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3252.596055: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 24 cur_tx: 2141912 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
2141911 tx_left: 1
1923136: hping3-2871 [001] .... 3253.596227:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 50
cur_tx: 2142066 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2142066 tx_left: 0
1923154: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3253.596289: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 51 cur_tx: 2142067 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
2142066 tx_left: 1
1951633: hping3-2871 [001] .... 3254.596459:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 5
cur_tx: 2142213 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2142213 tx_left: 0
1951651: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3254.596521: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 6 cur_tx: 2142214 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
2142213 tx_left: 1
1954472: hping3-2871 [001] .... 3255.596700:
rtl8169_start_xmit: ORP33 eth1 rtl8169_start_xmit len: 54 entry: 15
cur_tx: 2142223 frags: 0 dirty_tx: 2142223 tx_left: 0
1954490: <idle>-0 [000] ..s. 3255.596763: rtl8169_poll:
ORP33 eth1 rtl_tx len: 54 entry: 16 cur_tx: 2142224 frags: 0 dirty_tx:
2142223 tx_left: 1
//until it soon, again is slow..
BR.
Risto
On 7.12.2018 16:46, Risto Pajula wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have been to track the poor forwarding latency to the TCP Window scale
> options. The Netgem device uses rather large windows scale options
> (x256) and I have been able to reproduce the routers poor forwarding
> latency also with linux box running in the internal network and changing
> the net.ipv4.tcp_rmem to a large value and thus changing the TCP window
> scaling options to larger ones. I still do not have clue why this causes
> the forwarfing in the linux kernel to block? Maybe something in the
> connection tracking....?
>
>
> With the ICMP timestamp messages I have been able to also pinpoint that
> the latency is caused in the eth1 sending side (the following hping3
> example is run in the router toward the internal network...
>
>
> xxx:/usr/src/linux-4.20-rc2 # hping3 192.168.0.112 --icmp --icmp-ts -V
> using eth1, addr: 192.168.0.1, MTU: 1500
> HPING 192.168.0.112 (eth1 192.168.0.112): icmp mode set, 28 headers + 0
> data bytes
> len=46 ip=192.168.0.112 ttl=64 id=49464 tos=0 iplen=40
> icmp_seq=0 rtt=7.9 ms
> ICMP timestamp: Originate=52294891 Receive=52294895 Transmit=52294895
> ICMP timestamp RTT tsrtt=7
>
> len=46 ip=192.168.0.112 ttl=64 id=49795 tos=0 iplen=40
> icmp_seq=1 rtt=235.9 ms
> ICMP timestamp: Originate=52295891 Receive=52296128 Transmit=52296128
> ICMP timestamp RTT tsrtt=235
>
> len=46 ip=192.168.0.112 ttl=64 id=49941 tos=0 iplen=40
> icmp_seq=2 rtt=3.8 ms
> ICMP timestamp: Originate=52296891 Receive=52296895 Transmit=52296895
> ICMP timestamp RTT tsrtt=3
>
> len=46 ip=192.168.0.112 ttl=64 id=50685 tos=0 iplen=40
> icmp_seq=3 rtt=47.8 ms
> ICMP timestamp: Originate=52297891 Receive=52297940 Transmit=52297940
> ICMP timestamp RTT tsrtt=47
>
> len=46 ip=192.168.0.112 ttl=64 id=51266 tos=0 iplen=40
> icmp_seq=4 rtt=7.7 ms
> ICMP timestamp: Originate=52298891 Receive=52298895 Transmit=52298895
> ICMP timestamp RTT tsrtt=7
>
> len=46 ip=192.168.0.112 ttl=64 id=52245 tos=0 iplen=40
> icmp_seq=5 rtt=3.7 ms
> ICMP timestamp: Originate=52299891 Receive=52299895 Transmit=52299895
> ICMP timestamp RTT tsrtt=3
>
> ^C
> --- 192.168.0.112 hping statistic ---
> 6 packets tramitted, 6 packets received, 0% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max = 3.7/51.1/235.9 ms
>
>
>
> BR.
> Risto
>
> On 2.12.2018 23:32, Risto Pajula wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> You can most likely ignore the "DF Bit, mtu bug when forwarding" case.
>> There isn't actually big IP packets on the wire, instead there is
>> burst of packets on the wire, which are combined by the GRO... And
>> thus dropping them should not happen. Sorry about the invalid bug report.
>>
>> However the poor latency from intenal network to the internet still
>> remain, both GRO enabled and disabled. I will try to study further...
>>
>>
>> BR.
>> Risto
>>
>>
>> On 2.12.2018 14:01, Risto Pajula wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I have encountered a weird performance problem in Linux IP
>>> fragmentation when using video streaming services behind the NAT.
>>> Also I have studied a possible bug in the DF bit (don't fragment)
>>> handling when forwarding the IP packets.
>>>
>>> First the system setup description:
>>>
>>> [host1]-int lan-(eth1)[linux router](eth0)-extlan-[fibre
>>> router]-internet
>>>
>>> where:
>>> host1: is a Netgem N7800 "cable box" for online video streaming
>>> services provided by local telco (Can access Netflix, HBO nordic,
>>> "live TV", etc.)
>>> linux router: Linux computer with Dualcore Intel Celeron G1840,
>>> running currently Linux kernel 4.20.0-rc2, and openSUSE Leap 15.0
>>> eth1: Linux Routers internal (NAT) interface, 192.168.0.1/24 network,
>>> mtu set to 1500, RTL8169sb/8110sb
>>> eth0: Linux Routers internet facing interface, public ip address, mtu
>>> set to 1500, RTL8168evl/8111evl
>>> fibre router: Alcatel Lucent fibre router (I-241G-Q), directly
>>> connected to the eth0 of the Linux router.
>>>
>>> And now when using the Netgem N7800 with online video services
>>> (Netflix, HBO nordic, etc) the Linux router will receive very BIG IP
>>> packets in the eth0 upto ~20kB, this seems to lead to the following
>>> problems in the Linux IP stack.
>>>
>>> IP fragmentation performance:
>>> When the Linux router receives these large IP packets in the eth0
>>> everything works, but it seems that them cause very large performance
>>> degradation from internal network to the internet regarding the
>>> latency when the IP fragmentation is performed. The ping latency from
>>> internal network to the internel network increases from stable
>>> 15ms-20ms up to 700-800ms AND also the ping from the internal network
>>> to the linux router eth1 (192.168.0.). However up link works
>>> perfectly, the ping is still stable when streaming the online
>>> services (From linux router to the internet). It seems that the IP
>>> fragmentation is somehow blocking the eth1 reception or transmission
>>> for very long time (which it shouldn't). I'm able to test and debug
>>> the issue further, but advice regarding where to look would be
>>> appreciated.
>>>
>>>
>>> DF Bit, mtu bug when forwarding:
>>> I have started to study the above mentioned problem and have found a
>>> possible bug in the DF bit and mtu handling in IP forwarding. The BIG
>>> packets received from streaming services all have the "DF bit" set
>>> and the question is that should we be forwarding them at all as that
>>> would result them being fragmented? Apparently we currently are... I
>>> have traced this down to the ip_forward.c function ip_exceeds_mtu(),
>>> and the following patch seems to fix that.
>>>
>>> --- net/ipv4/ip_forward.c.orig 2018-12-02 11:09:32.764320780 +0200
>>> +++ net/ipv4/ip_forward.c 2018-12-02 12:53:25.031232347 +0200
>>> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static bool ip_exceeds_mtu(const struct
>>> return false;
>>>
>>> /* original fragment exceeds mtu and DF is set */
>>> - if (unlikely(IPCB(skb)->frag_max_size > mtu))
>>> + if (unlikely(skb->len > mtu))
>>> return true;
>>>
>>> if (skb->ignore_df)
>>>
>>>
>>> This seems to work (in some ways) - after the change IP packets that
>>> are too large to the internal network get dropped and we are sending
>>> "ICMP Destination unreachable, The datagram is too big" messages to
>>> the originator (as we should?). However it seems that not all
>>> services really like this... Netflix behaves as expected and ping is
>>> stable from internal network to the internet, but for example HBO
>>> nordic will not work anymore (too little buffering? Retransimissions
>>> not working?). So it seems the original issue should be also fixed
>>> (And the fragmention should be allowed?).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks!
>>>
>>> PS. Watching TV was not this intensive 20 years ago :)
>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists