netdev - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181209.165443.617494663676711708.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sun, 09 Dec 2018 16:54:43 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Cc:     sd@...asysnail.net, andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the net-next
 tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 11:48:48 +1100

> That is fine as a last resort, but it is probably less disruptive to
> find these things before you try to push i.e. as part of the "apply the
> patch" otherwise you could end up having to rebase a whole lot of later
> commits.

I meant to imply that we should do both, something I do pre-commit
and something that double checks again when I push.

Sorry if I wasn't clear.

> Anyway, here's my current version of my script.  It just takes a commit
> range (anything you can pass to "git log").  You may want to drop the
> gitk invocation at the end.

Thanks!