[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:20:52 -0800
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] selftests/bpf: use __bpf_constant_htons in test_prog.c
For some reason, my older GCC (< 4.8) isn't smart enough to optimize the
!__builtin_constant_p() branch in bpf_htons, I see:
error: implicit declaration of function '__builtin_bswap16'
Let's use __bpf_constant_htons as suggested by Daniel Borkmann.
I tried to use simple htons, but it produces the following:
test_progs.c:54:17: error: braced-group within expression allowed only
inside a function
.eth.h_proto = htons(ETH_P_IP),
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
index 26f1fdf3e2bf..126fc624290d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
@@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ static struct {
struct iphdr iph;
struct tcphdr tcp;
} __packed pkt_v4 = {
- .eth.h_proto = bpf_htons(ETH_P_IP),
+ .eth.h_proto = __bpf_constant_htons(ETH_P_IP),
.iph.ihl = 5,
.iph.protocol = 6,
- .iph.tot_len = bpf_htons(MAGIC_BYTES),
+ .iph.tot_len = __bpf_constant_htons(MAGIC_BYTES),
.tcp.urg_ptr = 123,
};
@@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ static struct {
struct ipv6hdr iph;
struct tcphdr tcp;
} __packed pkt_v6 = {
- .eth.h_proto = bpf_htons(ETH_P_IPV6),
+ .eth.h_proto = __bpf_constant_htons(ETH_P_IPV6),
.iph.nexthdr = 6,
- .iph.payload_len = bpf_htons(MAGIC_BYTES),
+ .iph.payload_len = __bpf_constant_htons(MAGIC_BYTES),
.tcp.urg_ptr = 123,
};
--
2.20.0.rc2.403.gdbc3b29805-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists