netdev - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 23/73] bpf: Fix verifier log string check for bad alignment.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Dec 2018 23:27:48 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 23/73] bpf: Fix verifier log string check for bad alignment.

From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>

[ Upstream commit c01ac66b38660f2b507ccd0b75d28e3002d56fbb ]

The message got changed a lot time ago.

This was responsible for 36 test case failures on sparc64.

Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 67c412d19c09..d80c36465c1c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -12746,7 +12746,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
 
 	reject_from_alignment = fd_prog < 0 &&
 				(test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) &&
-				strstr(bpf_vlog, "Unknown alignment.");
+				strstr(bpf_vlog, "misaligned");
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
 	if (reject_from_alignment) {
 		printf("FAIL\nFailed due to alignment despite having efficient unaligned access: '%s'!\n",
-- 
2.19.1