lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5C1301CB.9080703@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Dec 2018 09:05:15 +0800
From:   jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@...wei.com>
To:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
CC:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] VSOCK: batch sending rx buffer to increase
 bandwidth

On 2018/12/13 23:17, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 05:35:27PM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote:
>> Batch sending rx buffer can improve total bandwidth.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@...wei.com>
>> ---
> 
> Please send patches with git-send-email --thread --no-chain-reply-to so
> that your patch series email thread looks like this:
> 
>   * [PATCH 00/NN] My feature
>   +-- [PATCH 01/NN] First patch
>   +-- [PATCH 02/NN] Second patch
>   .
>   .
>   .
>   +-- [PATCH NN/NN] Last patch
> 
> This way it's much easier to view the entire series.  At the moment you
> are sending each patch as an independent email and there is no
> relationship between the emails.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefan
> 

Thanks Stefan, I have not send a series of patches before, and
I will use email thread form in the later version.

Thanks again,
Yiwen.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ