netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 6/6] bpf: BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_{SKB,SOCK,SOCK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQJE3v894ArK1G9720hZY=0YSyV9iobabssjx-b7KjspkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:11:03 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc:     Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>,
        Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 6/6] bpf: BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_{SKB,SOCK,SOCK_ADDR}
 require cgroups enabled

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 11:03 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> There is no way to exercise appropriate attach points without cgroups
> enabled. This lets test_verifier correctly skip tests for these
> prog_types if kernel was compiled without BPF cgroup support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf_types.h |  2 ++
>  net/core/filter.c         | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_types.h b/include/linux/bpf_types.h
> index 44d9ab4809bd..08bf2f1fe553 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_types.h
> @@ -6,9 +6,11 @@ BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, sk_filter)
>  BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, tc_cls_act)
>  BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT, tc_cls_act)
>  BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, xdp)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF
>  BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, cg_skb)
>  BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK, cg_sock)
>  BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR, cg_sock_addr)
> +#endif
>  BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN, lwt_in)
>  BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT, lwt_out)
>  BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT, lwt_xmit)
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index f9348806e843..6a390e519431 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -5315,6 +5315,7 @@ bpf_base_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
>         }
>  }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF
>  static const struct bpf_func_proto *
>  sock_filter_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  {
> @@ -5364,6 +5365,7 @@ sock_addr_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
>                 return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id);
>         }
>  }
> +#endif
>
>  static const struct bpf_func_proto *
>  sk_filter_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> @@ -5382,6 +5384,7 @@ sk_filter_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
>         }
>  }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF
>  static const struct bpf_func_proto *
>  cg_skb_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)

I don't think it's worth uglifying the code like this.
I prefer to leave it as-is.