lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <80ac109a-6e97-e24b-beea-37c047be4f55@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 16 Dec 2018 22:30:51 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@...le.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] tcp: TFO: search for correct cookie and
 accept data



On 12/14/2018 02:40 PM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> This change allows to search for the right cookie and accepts old ones
> (announcing a new one if it has changed).
> 
> __tcp_fastopen_cookie_gen_with_ctx() allows to generate a cookie based
> on a given TFO-context. A later patch will cleanup the duplicate code.

How long is kept the secondary (old) context ?

I do not know exact crypto_cipher_encrypt_one() cost, but it looks like
your patch could double the cost of some TFO based attacks ?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ