[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181218164528.GA22449@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:45:28 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net] lan743x: Expand phy search for LAN7431
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 04:41:20PM +0000, Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com wrote:
> > > - /* set to internal PHY id */
> > > - adapter->mdiobus->phy_mask = ~(u32)BIT(1);
> > > + if ((adapter->csr.id_rev & ID_REV_ID_MASK_) ==
> > ID_REV_ID_LAN7430_)
> > > + /* LAN7430 uses internal phy at address 1 */
> > > + adapter->mdiobus->phy_mask = ~(u32)BIT(1);
> >
> > Hi Bryan
> >
> > Does LAN7430 have an external MDIO bus as well as the internal one? Is
> > there a possibility for a PHY at address 0? If not, you can probably just not
> > have a mask at all.
> >
> > Andrew
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> The LAN7430 does not have an external MDIO bus.
> And there is no possibility for a PHY at address 0.
> The reason I kept the mask for LAN7430 case is to reduce effort in finding the phy.
> Since Linux will scan all addresses in that case unnecessarily.
>
> But I have tested your suggestion and it does work without a mask.
> So I'm fine either way.
Hi Bryan
Lets keep the patch as it is. As you said, it speeds things up, and
since there is no external MDIO bus, nobody can add a second PHY, or a
switch chip, etc.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists