netdev - Re: [PATCH net v3 0/2] net: mvpp2: phylink validate fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181219.083418.1274588153696095550.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:34:18 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     antoine.tenart@...tlin.com
Cc:     linux@...linux.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
        maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com, gregory.clement@...tlin.com,
        miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, nadavh@...vell.com, stefanc@...vell.com,
        ymarkman@...vell.com, mw@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 0/2] net: mvpp2: phylink validate fixes

From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:26:09 +0100

> Hi David,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 04:42:52PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>
>> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:56:04 +0100
>> 
>> > This small series introduces 2 fixes for the phylink validate function
>> > of the Marvell PPv2 Ethernet driver.
>> > 
>> > Since v2:
>> >   - Added an additional patch (2/2) as suggested by Russell.
>> >   - Rebased on top of net/master.
>> > 
>> > Since v1:
>> >   - Rebased on top of net/master.
>> 
>> Because, in the end, I applied:
>> 
>> 006791772084 ("net: mvpp2: 10G modes aren't supported on all ports")
>>
>> I am assuming this series is not relevant.
> 
> The patch 2/2 ("net: mvpp2: fix the phylink mode validation") is still
> relevant, in addition to the patch you applied. It was added in v3, and
> is an (unrelated) addition to the first patch.

Sorry about that!

Please resubmit patch #2 separately and I'll apply it.

Thank you!