[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181219.084521.1742003644237224676.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:45:21 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: pavel@...x.de
Cc: jiri@...nulli.us, Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com,
sergio.paracuellos@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com,
marex@...x.de, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next] net: dsa: microchip: add KSZ9477 I2C driver
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 17:08:57 +0100
> Hi!
>
>> >+static int ksz_i2c_write32(struct ksz_device *dev, u32 reg, u32 value)
>> >+{
>> >+ value = cpu_to_be32(value);
>> >+ return ksz_i2c_write(dev, reg, &value, 4);
>> >+}
>> >+
>> >+static int ksz_i2c_get(struct ksz_device *dev, u32 reg, void *data, size_t len)
>> >+{
>> >+ return ksz_i2c_read(dev, reg, data, len);
>> >+}
>> >+
>> >+static int ksz_i2c_set(struct ksz_device *dev, u32 reg, void *data, size_t len)
>> >+{
>> >+ return ksz_i2c_write(dev, reg, data, len);
>> >+}
>>
>>
>> This header file makes no sense. Please move the functions into .c
>
> No, that would make code bigger & slower.
>
> It makes sense to me. But I'd add "inline" keyword to make the goal
> explicit.
Let the compiler decide in *.c files please. That is our rule.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists