netdev - Re: [PATCH rds linux-next v4 0/2] WARNING in rds_message_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181219.102204.419537206783531284.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:22:04 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com
Cc:     shamir.rabinovitch@...cle.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        rds-devel@....oracle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        gerd.rausch@...cle.com, haakon.bugge@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH rds linux-next v4 0/2] WARNING in rds_message_alloc_sgs

From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:00:20 -0800

> On 12/19/2018 2:54 AM, Shamir Rabinovitch wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 03:02:24PM -0800, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> [...]
> 
>>>
>>> Shamir, please check if these apply cleanly to Dave's 'net' tree.
>>>
> 
>> Santosh,
>> The patches apply cleanly on the master branch of
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git .
>> See below the snippet of the log with the patches applied.
>>
>> 8472aa4edfcb (HEAD -> net/master#rds-syzbot-bug) net/rds: remove user
>> triggered WARN_ON in rds_sendmsg
>> 3f8d6b898c5e net/rds: fix warn in rds_message_alloc_sgs
>> 3061169a47ee (net/master) Merge
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf
>> 78abe3d0dfad net/smc: fix TCP fallback socket release
>> f7db2beb4c2c vxge: ensure data0 is initialized in when fetching
>> firmware version information
>> 
> Great. On patchwork I see the patches marked under review by Dave so
> lets wait for his instruction(s).

Since they apply cleanly to 'net' I'll apply them directly and queue up
for -stable.

Thanks for checking.