[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181219182930.8825-14-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:29:24 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: oss-drivers@...ronome.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 13/19] nfp: bpf: don't use instruction number for jump target
Instruction number is meaningless at code gen phase. The target
of the instruction is overwritten by nfp_fixup_branches(). The
convention is to put the raw offset in target address as a place
holder. See cmp_* functions.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
index 662cbc21d909..284a6a98a4fc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
@@ -3189,7 +3189,7 @@ bpf_to_bpf_call(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
wrp_immed_relo(nfp_prog, imm_b(nfp_prog), 0, RELO_IMMED_REL);
} else {
ret_tgt = nfp_prog_current_offset(nfp_prog) + 2;
- emit_br(nfp_prog, BR_UNC, meta->n + 1 + meta->insn.imm, 1);
+ emit_br(nfp_prog, BR_UNC, meta->insn.imm, 1);
offset_br = nfp_prog_current_offset(nfp_prog);
}
wrp_immed_relo(nfp_prog, ret_reg(nfp_prog), ret_tgt, RELO_IMMED_REL);
--
2.19.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists