[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3e9b297-2afe-257d-bb80-833f2d5dd69c@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 21:27:24 +0000
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To: Martin Lau <kafai@...com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Ensure line_info.insn_off cannot point to
insn with zero code
On 12/19/18 1:01 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> This series ensures the line_info (passed by the userspace during
> bpf_prog_load) cannot have its line_info.insn_off pointing to a
> zero bpf insn code. F.e. a broken userspace tool might
> generate a line_info.insn_off that points to the second
> 8 bytes of a BPF_LD_IMM64.
>
> The first patch is the kernel change.
> The second patch is a new test case.
>
> Martin KaFai Lau (2):
> bpf: Ensure line_info.insn_off cannot point to insn with zero code
> bpf: Add BPF_LD_IMM64 to the line_info test
>
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 8 ++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
Looks good to me. For the whole series,
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists