[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1545334536-766-3-git-send-email-john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 11:35:30 -0800
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/8] bpf: sk_msg, improve offset chk in _is_valid_access
The check for max offset in sk_msg_is_valid_access uses sizeof()
which is incorrect because it would allow accessing possibly
past the end of the struct in the padded case. Further, it doesn't
preclude accessing any padding that may be added in the middle of
a struct. All told this makes it fragile to rely on.
To fix this explicitly check offsets with fields using the
bpf_ctx_range() and bpf_ctx_range_till() macros.
For reference the current structure layout looks as follows (reported
by pahole)
struct sk_msg_md {
union {
void * data; /* 8 */
}; /* 0 8 */
union {
void * data_end; /* 8 */
}; /* 8 8 */
__u32 family; /* 16 4 */
__u32 remote_ip4; /* 20 4 */
__u32 local_ip4; /* 24 4 */
__u32 remote_ip6[4]; /* 28 16 */
__u32 local_ip6[4]; /* 44 16 */
__u32 remote_port; /* 60 4 */
/* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
__u32 local_port; /* 64 4 */
__u32 size; /* 68 4 */
/* size: 72, cachelines: 2, members: 10 */
/* last cacheline: 8 bytes */
};
So there should be no padding at the moment but fixing this now
prevents future errors.
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
---
net/core/filter.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 3a3b217..6bd9f08 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -6313,6 +6313,9 @@ static bool sk_msg_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
if (type == BPF_WRITE)
return false;
+ if (off % size != 0)
+ return false;
+
switch (off) {
case offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, data):
info->reg_type = PTR_TO_PACKET;
@@ -6324,16 +6327,20 @@ static bool sk_msg_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
if (size != sizeof(__u64))
return false;
break;
- default:
+ case bpf_ctx_range(struct sk_msg_md, family):
+ case bpf_ctx_range(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip4):
+ case bpf_ctx_range(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip4):
+ case bpf_ctx_range_till(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[0], remote_ip6[3]):
+ case bpf_ctx_range_till(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[0], local_ip6[3]):
+ case bpf_ctx_range(struct sk_msg_md, remote_port):
+ case bpf_ctx_range(struct sk_msg_md, local_port):
+ case bpf_ctx_range(struct sk_msg_md, size):
if (size != sizeof(__u32))
return false;
- }
-
- if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(struct sk_msg_md))
- return false;
- if (off % size != 0)
+ break;
+ default:
return false;
-
+ }
return true;
}
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists