netdev - linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Dec 2018 17:02:53 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the net-next
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the char-misc tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c

between commit:

  aea0a897af9e ("ptp: Fix pass zero to ERR_PTR() in ptp_clock_register")

from the net-next tree and commit:

  b9d93594c767 ("ptp: fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check")

from the char-misc tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the latter version) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped