| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20181220061309.28287-4-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 22:13:05 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: oss-drivers@...ronome.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/7] selftests: bpf: verifier: add tests for JSET interpretation
Validate that the verifier reasons correctly about the bounds
and removes dead code based on results of JSET instruction.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 96 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 580fc9429147..b246931c46ef 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -14265,6 +14265,102 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.retval = 2,
.data = { 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, },
},
+ {
+ "jset: known const compare",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
+ .retval_unpriv = 1,
+ .result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 1,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
+ {
+ "jset: known const compare bad",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "!read_ok",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "!read_ok",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "jset: unknown const compare taken",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "!read_ok",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "!read_ok",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "jset: unknown const compare not taken",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "!read_ok",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "!read_ok",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "jset: half-known const compare",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_0, 2),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 3, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
+ .result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
+ {
+ "jset: range",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, 0xff),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_1, 0xf0, 3),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_1, 0x10, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_1, 0x10, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, 0x10, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
+ .result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
};
static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)
--
2.19.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists