[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMiiRLCerdvOikn=xMqw+-Yu=UEm-YhdSMyXtCDzte0kcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 08:54:25 +0200
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gavi Teitz <gavi@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 4:47 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 8956f0014ea5 ("net/mlx5e: Fix default amount of channels for VF representors")
>
> from the net tree and commit:
>
> d9ee0491c2ff ("net/mlx5e: Use dedicated uplink vport netdev representor")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just used the net-next tree version) and can carry the
> fix as necessary. [..]
Yes, this is correct, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists