netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Dec 2018 08:54:25 +0200
From:   Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Gavi Teitz <gavi@...lanox.com>,
        Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 4:47 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   8956f0014ea5 ("net/mlx5e: Fix default amount of channels for VF representors")
>
> from the net tree and commit:
>
>   d9ee0491c2ff ("net/mlx5e: Use dedicated uplink vport netdev representor")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just used the net-next tree version) and can carry the
> fix as necessary.  [..]

Yes, this is correct, thanks!