lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20181221092958.GA2240@kadam> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:29:58 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> To: Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com Cc: marex@...x.de, pavel@...x.de, jiri@...nulli.us, andrew@...n.ch, sergio.paracuellos@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next] net: dsa: microchip: add KSZ9477 I2C driver On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:50:16PM +0000, Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com wrote: > > So if I change the new code, should I go back to correct the old code? Other operating systems would worry about breaking code which is working fine, but re-writing ancient code is The Linux Way. regards, dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists