lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181221092958.GA2240@kadam>
Date:   Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:29:58 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com
Cc:     marex@...x.de, pavel@...x.de, jiri@...nulli.us, andrew@...n.ch,
        sergio.paracuellos@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next] net: dsa: microchip: add KSZ9477 I2C driver

On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:50:16PM +0000, Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com wrote:
>
> So if I change the new code, should I go back to correct the old code?

Other operating systems would worry about breaking code which is working
fine, but re-writing ancient code is The Linux Way.

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists