[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181223205734.GG2791@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 21:57:34 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Robert Hancock <hancock@...systems.ca>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, arkadis@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: Errors enabling bridge with KSZ9897 DSA switch driver
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 01:29:42PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> On 2018-12-23 5:23 a.m., Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 08:29:08PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> >>I have a device using a KSZ9897 switch
> >>(CONFIG_MICROCHIP_KSZ_SPI_DRIVER=y) using a 4.19.9 kernel, where I am
> >>trying to enable a bridge on some of the ports using systemd-networkd.
> >
> >Hi Robert
> >
> >I don't think many of use use such a setup, so we probably have not
> >noticed this.
> >
> >>However, it seems to be getting an error when it tries to configure the
> >>ports to be part of the bridge. systemd-networkd complains with:
> >>
> >>lan1: Set link
> >>lan1: Could not join netdev: Operation not supported
> >>lan1: Failed
> >>
> >>and the kernel complains:
> >>
> >>lan: bridge flag offload is not supported 4(lan1)
> >>
> >>That message is coming from br_switchdev_set_port_flag in
> >>net/bridge/br_switchdev.c. Adding some more output to that statement
> >>tells me:
> >>
> >>lan: bridge flag offload is not supported, flags 18656 mask 64 support
> >>0, 4(lan1)
> >>
> >>which appears to mean something is trying to enable BR_BCAST_FLOOD,
> >>BR_MCAST_FLOOD, BR_PROMISC, BR_FLOOD, BR_LEARNING on the port, but it is
> >>failing to enable BR_FLOOD because brport_flags_support is 0. I am just
> >>using the default bridge settings in systemd-networkd, so that is
> >>nothing that I am specifying explicitly.
> >
> >I think this is a systemd problem. It should first query what flags
> >are supported. See
> >
> >dc0ecabd6231 ("net: switchdev: Add support for querying supported bridge flags by hardware")
> >
> >And then only try to turn on flags which are supported. If it tries
> >to turn on flags which are not supported, an error is the correct
> >thing to do.
>
> I may be missing some context about how the switchdev/DSA code works, but
> are those flags actually unsupported, or just unsupported in hardware
> offload? Userspace doesn't know or care about the hardware offload
> capability of the switch, it's just trying to set standard flags on the
> bridge.
Hi Robert
We really need Arkadi Sharshevsky to comment on this.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists