[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181224.095846.1987517984305782151.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 09:58:46 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fw@...len.de
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] staging: octeon: fix build failure with XFRM
enabled
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 21:57:26 +0100
> skb->sp doesn't exist anymore in the next-next tree, so mips defconfig
> no longer builds. Use helper instead to reset the secpath.
>
> Not even compile tested.
>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Fixes: 4165079ba328d ("net: switch secpath to use skb extension infrastructure")
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
> ---
> Greg, David:
>
> The patch will not break build for a tree that lacks the 'Fixes'
> commit, so this can also go in via staging tree.
> OTOH, net-next build is broken for mips/octeon, so I think in
> this case net-next might make more sense?
Yeah I agree, that net-next is probably the best place for this.
Because I know that Linus is sensitive to situations where he is
sent a pull request, and then what he pulls doesn't match the pull
request shortlog etc. I have asked him how he would let me handle
this.
That's the only reason I haven't integrated this yet.
Just FYI!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists