[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e98a763-664a-6a95-53ad-a150c3c199b8@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 09:42:57 -0500
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: wenxu@...oud.cn, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] vrf: Add VRF_F_BYPASS_RCV_NF flag to vrf device
On 12/27/18 2:38 AM, wenxu@...oud.cn wrote:
> From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
>
> In the ip_rcv the skb go through the PREROUTING hook first,
> Then jump in vrf device go through the same hook again.
> When conntrack work with vrf, there will be some conflict for rules.
> Because the package go through the hook twice with different nf status
>
> ip link add user1 type vrf table 1
> ip link add user2 type vrf table 2
> ip l set dev tun1 master user1
> ip l set dev tun2 master user2
>
> nft add table firewall
> nft add chain firewall zones { type filter hook prerouting priority - 300 \; }
> nft add rule firewall zones counter ct zone set iif map { "tun1" : 1, "tun2" : 2 }
> nft add chain firewall rule-1000-ingress
> nft add rule firewall rule-1000-ingress ct zone 1 tcp dport 22 ct state new counter accept
> nft add rule firewall rule-1000-ingress counter drop
> nft add chain firewall rule-1000-egress
> nft add rule firewall rule-1000-egress tcp dport 22 ct state new counter drop
> nft add rule firewall rule-1000-egress counter accept
>
> nft add chain firewall rules-all { type filter hook prerouting priority - 150 \; }
> nft add rule firewall rules-all ip daddr vmap { "2.2.2.11" : jump rule-1000-ingress }
> nft add rule firewall rules-all ct zone vmap { 1 : jump rule-1000-egress }
>
> nft add rule firewall dnat-all ct zone vmap { 1 : jump dnat-1000 }
> nft add rule firewall dnat-1000 ip daddr 2.2.2.11 counter dnat to 10.0.0.7
>
> For a package with ip daddr 2.2.2.11 and tcp dport 22, first time accept in the
> rule-1000-ingress and dnat to 10.0.0.7. Then second time the packet goto the wrong
> chain rule-1000-egress which leads the packet drop
>
> So it proived a flag to control the vrf-device bypass go through hook for
> the second time.
>
> Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
> ---
> drivers/net/vrf.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Thanks for the report with commands to reproduce. I am out of the office
at the moment; I will take a look at this next week.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists