netdev - [RFC ipsec 1/1] xfrm: Make set-mark default behavior backward compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190105003055.116457-2-benedictwong@google.com>
Date:   Fri,  4 Jan 2019 16:30:55 -0800
From:   Benedict Wong <benedictwong@...gle.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     nharold@...gle.com, benedictwong@...gle.com, lorenzo@...gle.com,
        maze@...gle.com
Subject: [RFC ipsec 1/1] xfrm: Make set-mark default behavior backward compatible

Fixes 9b42c1f179a6, which changed the default route lookup behavior for
tunnel mode SAs in the outbound direction to use the skb mark, whereas
previously mark=0 was used if the output mark was unspecified. In
mark-based routing schemes such as Android’s, this change in default
behavior causes routing loops or lookup failures.

This patch restores the default behavior of using a 0 mark while still
incorporating the skb mark if the SET_MARK (and SET_MARK_MASK) is
specified.

Tested with additions to Android's kernel unit test suite:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/tests/+/860150

Fixes: 9b42c1f179a6 ("xfrm: Extend the output_mark to support input direction and masking")
Signed-off-by: Benedict Wong <benedictwong@...gle.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 934492bad8e0..5f574ede1332 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -2600,7 +2600,10 @@ static struct dst_entry *xfrm_bundle_create(struct xfrm_policy *policy,
 		dst_copy_metrics(dst1, dst);
 
 		if (xfrm[i]->props.mode != XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT) {
-			__u32 mark = xfrm_smark_get(fl->flowi_mark, xfrm[i]);
+			__u32 mark = 0;
+
+			if (xfrm[i]->props.smark.v || xfrm[i]->props.smark.m)
+				mark = xfrm_smark_get(fl->flowi_mark, xfrm[i]);
 
 			family = xfrm[i]->props.family;
 			dst = xfrm_dst_lookup(xfrm[i], tos, fl->flowi_oif,
-- 
2.20.1.97.g81188d93c3-goog