lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <210dc841-f31d-5e4b-d292-eecba0c085d9@hartkopp.net>
Date:   Mon, 7 Jan 2019 13:14:44 +0100
From:   Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     linux-can@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, ieatmuttonchuan@...il.com,
        meissner@...e.de, mkubecek@...e.cz, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] can: gw: ensure DLC boundaries after CAN frame
 modification

Hello Marc,

On 1/5/19 11:56 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 1/4/19 10:41 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
>> Date: Fri,  4 Jan 2019 15:55:26 +0100
>>
>> Marc, do you want me to apply this directly to my net tree?
> 
> No, I'll send a pull request.
> 
> Thanks,
> Marc

I was still on vacation last week an my environment at home was not that 
amused - but I really tried to fix this CVE as fast as possible in the 
best way we could.

Now the patch is nearly 70h hanging around and 48h since you announced 
to send a pull request.

I don't get it. Wouldn't it been better when you just wrote one sentence 
so that the patch could go upstream already on Saturday?

Regards,
Oliver

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ