netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] can: gw: ensure DLC boundaries after CAN frame modification

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Jan 2019 13:14:44 +0100
From:   Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     linux-can@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, ieatmuttonchuan@...il.com,
        meissner@...e.de, mkubecek@...e.cz, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] can: gw: ensure DLC boundaries after CAN frame
 modification

Hello Marc,

On 1/5/19 11:56 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 1/4/19 10:41 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
>> Date: Fri,  4 Jan 2019 15:55:26 +0100
>>
>> Marc, do you want me to apply this directly to my net tree?
> 
> No, I'll send a pull request.
> 
> Thanks,
> Marc

I was still on vacation last week an my environment at home was not that 
amused - but I really tried to fix this CVE as fast as possible in the 
best way we could.

Now the patch is nearly 70h hanging around and 48h since you announced 
to send a pull request.

I don't get it. Wouldn't it been better when you just wrote one sentence 
so that the patch could go upstream already on Saturday?

Regards,
Oliver