netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] coding-style: Clarify the expectations around bool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Jan 2019 20:21:35 -0700
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Gal Pressman <galpress@...zon.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>, xavier.huwei@...wei.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] coding-style: Clarify the expectations around bool

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 04:38:50PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 16:25 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:10:22PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 14:11 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > There has been some confusion since checkpatch started warning about bool
> > > > use in structures, and people have been avoiding using it.
> > > > 
> > > > Many people feel there is still a legitimate place for bool in structures,
> > > > so provide some guidance on bool usage derived from the entire thread that
> > > > spawned the checkpatch warning.
> > > 
> > > Thanks Jason.
> > > 
> > > It'd be nice to combine this with some better checkpatch warning or
> > > even a removal of that misleading warning from checkpatch
> > > altogether.
> > 
> > Okay, do you have a preference?
> 
> Yes.

Great, done, thanks

Jason