[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190108195923.GD30894@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 20:59:23 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 perf, bpf-next 3/7] perf, bpf: introduce
PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:29:00AM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> +static void perf_event_bpf_emit_ksymbols(struct bpf_prog *prog,
> + enum perf_bpf_event_type type)
> +{
> + bool unregister = type == PERF_BPF_EVENT_PROG_UNLOAD;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (prog->aux->func_cnt == 0) {
> + perf_event_ksymbol(PERF_RECORD_MISC_KSYMBOL_TYPE_BPF,
> + (u64)(unsigned long)prog->bpf_func,
> + prog->jited_len, unregister,
> + perf_event_bpf_get_name, prog);
> + } else {
> + for (i = 0; i < prog->aux->func_cnt; i++) {
> + struct bpf_prog *subprog = prog->aux->func[i];
> +
> + perf_event_ksymbol(
> + PERF_RECORD_MISC_KSYMBOL_TYPE_BPF,
> + (u64)(unsigned long)subprog->bpf_func,
> + subprog->jited_len, unregister,
> + perf_event_bpf_get_name, subprog);
> + }
> + }
> +}
That's a bit unexpected, but yes sure, that works for now.
I was expecting it to be hooked up in your kallsym rbtree thing, but
whatever, we can fix that when needed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists