[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3595b09c-0000-0d67-e080-0341bdbf307e@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:00:06 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] vrf: Add VRF_F_BYPASS_RCV_NF flag to vrf device
On 1/10/19 8:21 AM, wenxu wrote:
>
> How about the status of this patch? Should I resubmit it?
>
I do not like the need for a flag when the VRF is created. If something
changes with the firewall rules, it means a user has to delete and
re-create the VRF which is really expensive.
It would be better to detect this on the fly - similar to how it detects
the default qdisc and avoids the recirculation on Tx when the qdisc is
the default.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists