netdev - [PATCH bpf 1/3] bpf: fix bpffs bitfield pretty print

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Jan 2019 11:14:00 -0800
From:   Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 1/3] bpf: fix bpffs bitfield pretty print

Commit 9d5f9f701b18 ("bpf: btf: fix struct/union/fwd types
with kind_flag") introduced kind_flag and used bitfield_size
in the btf_member to directly pretty print member values.

The commit contained a bug where the incorrect parameters could be
passed to function btf_bitfield_seq_show(). The bits_offset
parameter in the function expects a value less than 8.
Instead, the member offset in the structure is passed.

The below is btf_bitfield_seq_show() func signature:
  void btf_bitfield_seq_show(void *data, u8 bits_offset,
                             u8 nr_bits, struct seq_file *m)
both bits_offset and nr_bits are u8 type. If the bitfield
member offset is greater than 256, incorrect value will
be printed.

This patch fixed the issue by calculating correct proper
data offset and bits_offset similar to non kind_flag case.

Fixes: 9d5f9f701b18 ("bpf: btf: fix struct/union/fwd types with kind_flag")
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
---
 kernel/bpf/btf.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 715f9fcf4712..a2f53642592b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -1219,8 +1219,6 @@ static void btf_bitfield_seq_show(void *data, u8 bits_offset,
 	u8 nr_copy_bits;
 	u64 print_num;
 
-	data += BITS_ROUNDDOWN_BYTES(bits_offset);
-	bits_offset = BITS_PER_BYTE_MASKED(bits_offset);
 	nr_copy_bits = nr_bits + bits_offset;
 	nr_copy_bytes = BITS_ROUNDUP_BYTES(nr_copy_bits);
 
@@ -1255,7 +1253,9 @@ static void btf_int_bits_seq_show(const struct btf *btf,
 	 * BTF_INT_OFFSET() cannot exceed 64 bits.
 	 */
 	total_bits_offset = bits_offset + BTF_INT_OFFSET(int_data);
-	btf_bitfield_seq_show(data, total_bits_offset, nr_bits, m);
+	data += BITS_ROUNDDOWN_BYTES(total_bits_offset);
+	bits_offset = BITS_PER_BYTE_MASKED(total_bits_offset);
+	btf_bitfield_seq_show(data, bits_offset, nr_bits, m);
 }
 
 static void btf_int_seq_show(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
@@ -2001,12 +2001,12 @@ static void btf_struct_seq_show(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
 
 		member_offset = btf_member_bit_offset(t, member);
 		bitfield_size = btf_member_bitfield_size(t, member);
+		bytes_offset = BITS_ROUNDDOWN_BYTES(member_offset);
+		bits8_offset = BITS_PER_BYTE_MASKED(member_offset);
 		if (bitfield_size) {
-			btf_bitfield_seq_show(data, member_offset,
+			btf_bitfield_seq_show(data + bytes_offset, bits8_offset,
 					      bitfield_size, m);
 		} else {
-			bytes_offset = BITS_ROUNDDOWN_BYTES(member_offset);
-			bits8_offset = BITS_PER_BYTE_MASKED(member_offset);
 			ops = btf_type_ops(member_type);
 			ops->seq_show(btf, member_type, member->type,
 				      data + bytes_offset, bits8_offset, m);
-- 
2.17.1