[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5dfb9bb4-5148-9288-dcee-22b7d3997a1a@ucloud.cn>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:05:07 +0800
From: wenxu <wenxu@...oud.cn>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: x_tables: add xt_tunnel match
On 1/10/2019 12:41 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:12:24PM +0800, wenxu@...oud.cn wrote:
> [...]
>> +static struct xt_match tunnel_mt_reg __read_mostly = {
>> + .name = "tunnel",
>> + .revision = 0,
>> + .family = NFPROTO_UNSPEC,
>> + .match = tunnel_mt,
>> + .matchsize = sizeof(struct xt_tunnel_mtinfo),
> Does this work away from the prerouting hook?
Yes, I just test all the hooks. It can work for ingress packet match for PREROUTING and INPUT.
egress packet (output go through a lwtunnel) on FORWARD, OUTPUT and POSTROUTING.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists