[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3856ca3c-6547-385c-00f1-8b40a2ccb0ba@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:00:24 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 0/3] bpf: fix bpffs/bpftool bitfield value printing
On 01/10/2019 08:14 PM, Yonghong Song wrote:
> The previous BTF kind_flag support patch set introduced a bug
> for kernel bpffs pretty printing and another bug for bpftool
> map pretty printing. If a bitfield struct member offset is
> greater than 256 bits, printed value for that struct
> member will be incorrect.
>
> Patch #1 fixed the bug in kernel bpffs pretty printing.
> Patch #2 enhanced the test_btf test case to cover the issue
> exposed by patch #1.
> Patch #3 fixed the bug in bpftool map pretty printing.
>
> Yonghong Song (3):
> bpf: fix bpffs bitfield pretty print
> tools/bpf: test btf bitfield with >=256 struct member offset
> tools/bpf: fix bpftool map dump with bitfields
>
> kernel/bpf/btf.c | 12 +++++------
> tools/bpf/bpftool/btf_dumper.c | 13 ++++++------
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_btf.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists