[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190111.175303.1528012358618102203.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 17:53:03 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: baijiaju1990@...il.com
Cc: yanjun.zhu@...cle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: nvidia: forcedeth: Fix two possible concurrency
use-after-free bugs
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 20:45:18 +0800
> In drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c, the functions
> nv_start_xmit() and nv_start_xmit_optimized() can be concurrently
> executed with nv_poll_controller().
>
> nv_start_xmit
> line 2321: prev_tx_ctx->skb = skb;
>
> nv_start_xmit_optimized
> line 2479: prev_tx_ctx->skb = skb;
>
> nv_poll_controller
> nv_do_nic_poll
> line 4134: spin_lock(&np->lock);
> nv_drain_rxtx
> nv_drain_tx
> nv_release_txskb
> line 2004: dev_kfree_skb_any(tx_skb->skb);
>
> Thus, two possible concurrency use-after-free bugs may occur.
I do not think so, the netif_tx_lock_bh() done will prevent the parallel
execution.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists