[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190115225447.245788-2-sdf@google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 14:54:46 -0800
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
songliubraving@...com, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 2/3] bpf: zero out build_id for BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP
When returning BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP from stack_map_get_build_id_offset,
make sure that build_id field is empty. Since we are using percpu
free list, there is a possibility that we might reuse some previous
bpf_stack_build_id with non-zero build_id.
Fixes: 615755a77b24 ("bpf: extend stackmap to save binary_build_id+offset instead of address")
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
---
kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
index 8975d1768dcb..f4b57c68c45f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
@@ -315,6 +315,7 @@ static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs,
for (i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++) {
id_offs[i].status = BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP;
id_offs[i].ip = ips[i];
+ memset(id_offs[i].build_id, 0, BPF_BUILD_ID_SIZE);
}
return;
}
@@ -325,6 +326,7 @@ static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs,
/* per entry fall back to ips */
id_offs[i].status = BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP;
id_offs[i].ip = ips[i];
+ memset(id_offs[i].build_id, 0, BPF_BUILD_ID_SIZE);
continue;
}
id_offs[i].offset = (vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT) + ips[i]
--
2.20.1.97.g81188d93c3-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists